United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Lykins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Lykins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided July 14, 2026 · Brian H. Corcoran
Lykins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0692V

LINDA LYKINS,

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: June 2, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Renee J. Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On January 12, 2021, Linda Lykins filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following an influenza vaccination she received on September 11, 2019. Petition, ECF No. 1. On October 14, 2025, I issued a ruling on entitlement finding Petitioner entitled to compensation, following briefing by the parties. ECF. No. 60. On 1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. February 18, 2026, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 67.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $47,528.16 (representing $46,755.15 in fees plus $768.11 in costs and $4.90 in Petitioner out-of-pocket expenses). Petitioner’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed February 24, 2026, ECF No. 71. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that $4.90 in personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. ECF No. 71-1 at 1.

Respondent reacted to the motion on March 9, 2026, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondents Response to Motion at ECF No. 72. Petitioner filed no reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed through 2025 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be awarded herein. Petitioner has requested the hourly rate of $649.00 for 2026 work performed by attorney Renee Gentry, representing a rate increase of $47.00 from the previous year. I find the proposed rate increase to be reasonable and it is hereby awarded herein.

Regarding the time billed, I note this case required additional briefing regarding entitlement. See Motion for Finding of Fact and Ruling on the Record, filed June 20, 2024, ECF No. 57; Petitioner’s Reply to Respondent’s Response to Motion for Finding of Fact and Ruling on the Record, filed Sept. 24, 2024, ECF No. 59; Petitioner’s counsel expended approximately 4.0 hours drafting the entitlement brief and 1.5 hours drafting the responsive brief, for a combined total of 5.5 hours. ECF No. 71-1 at 10-11. I find this amount of time to be reasonable and will award the attorney’s fees requested.

Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 71-1 at 43-62. I find the requested costs to be reasonable and hereby award them in full.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorney’s fees and costs in the total amount of $47,528.16 as follows:

A lump sum of $47,523.26 (representing $46,755.15 in fees plus $768.11 in costs), to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel of record: Renee Gentry IOLTA account for prompt disbursement; and

A lump sum of $4.90, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s out-of- pocket expenses, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel of record: Renee Gentry IOLTA account for prompt disbursement.

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.