United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Diercks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Diercks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided July 20, 2026 · Brian H. Corcoran
Diercks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0192V

LEANN DIERCKS,

Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran v.

Filed: June 10, 2026 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Daniel Alholm, Alholm Law PC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.

Felicia Langel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On February 3, 2025, LeAnn Diercks filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following the influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on December 28, 2023. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 17, 2026, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On June 9, 2026, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $50,000.00, for her pain and suffering. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $50,000.00 (for her pain and suffering), to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS LEANN DIERCKS,

Petitioner, v. No. 25-192V

Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1 On February 3, 2025, LeAnn Diercks (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, as amended (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on December 28, 2023. Petition at 1. On April 14, 2026, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his amended Rule 4(c) report indicating that, in light of the Chief Special Master’s March 13, 2026 Findings of Fact that petitioner’s symptoms were limited to her vaccinated shoulder, respondent will not continue to defend this case on other grounds during further proceedings on entitlement before the Office of Special Masters. ECF No. 25 at 6; ECF No. 28 at 2. On April 17, 2026, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. See ECF No. 29.

I. Items of Compensation

Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award/Recommended Payment

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through one lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

A lump sum payment of $50,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, LeAnn Diercks. Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division JAMES V. LOPEZ Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Felicia D. Langel FELICIA D. LANGEL Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 451-7659 [email protected]

DATED: June 9, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that today, June 9, 2026, a copy of the foregoing pleading was served by electronic mail to Daniel Alholm at [email protected].

/s/ Felicia D. Langel

1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.