Bansch-Wickert v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0754V

JULIE BANSCH-WICKERT,

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 7, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Margaret Armstrong, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On May 1, 2025, Julie Bansch-Wickert filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination she received on June 4, 2024. Petition, ECF No. 1. On December 17, 2025, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 21.

1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $27,365.38 (representing $26,506.30 in fees plus $859.08 in costs). Motion for Payment of Petitioner’s Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Case Costs (Motion”) filed March 31, 2026. ECF No. 29. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. ECF No. 29-4 at 1.

Respondent reacted to the motion on April 14, 2026, representing that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of fees and costs are met in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondents’ Response to Motion at ECF No. 30. On April 15, 2026, Petitioner filed a reply requesting that the amount of fees and costs in the Motion be awarded. ECF No. 31.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed by attorneys Danielle Strait and Jessica Olins through 2026 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be awarded herein.

Petitioner has also requested that I apply an hourly rate of $444.00 for work performed in 2025 by attorney Haroun Rahimi. Petitioner represents that Mr. Rahimi has been a licensed attorney since 2013 and was admitted to the Court in 2025. He has approximately 13 years of legal experience prior to focusing his practice on representing petitioners in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program at Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. I find this requested rate to be reasonable, and it shall be awarded herein. And all time billed to the matter was reasonably incurred.

Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 29-3 at 1-21. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $27,365.38 (representing $26,506.30 in fees plus $859.08 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master