United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Kelley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Kelley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided August 20, 2026 · Brian H. Corcoran
Kelley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 25-1649V

MIA KELLEY,

Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran v.

Filed: June 30, 2026 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Mitchell Jones, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On October 3, 2025, Mia Kelley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 9, 2023. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 11, 2026, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On June 30, 2026, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $52,500.00 for her actual pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $52,500.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS )

MIA KELLEY, ) )

Petitioner, ) ) No. 25-1649V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )

SERVICES, ) )

Respondent. ) )

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1

On October 3, 2025, Mia Kelley (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 9, 2023. Petition at 1. On May 8, 2026, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 14.

On May 11, 2026, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 16.

I. Items of Compensation

Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $52,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award and Recommended Payment

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

A lump sum payment of $52,500.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Mia Kelley.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, BRETT A. SHUMATE

Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Mitchell Jones

MITCHEL JONES

Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146

Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0146

Tel: (202) 305-1748 [email protected]

DATED: June 30, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that today, June 30, 2026, a copy of the foregoing pleading was served by electronic mail to Laura Levenberg at [email protected] and [email protected].

s/ Mitchell Jones

1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.