United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Sherman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Sherman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided August 28, 2026 · Brian H. Corcoran
Sherman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-174V

DENISE SHERMAN,

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner,

v. Filed: July 22, 2026 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.

Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 30, 2025, Denise Sherman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 14, 2023. Petition, ECF No. 1. On May 12, 2026, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 24.

1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $32,409.02 (representing $31,612.30 in fees plus $796.72 in costs). Petitioner’s Counsel’s Application for Attorneys Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed June 23, 2026, ECF No. 29. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. ECF No. 29 at 45.

Respondent reacted to the motion on June 29, 2026, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondent makes no specific objection, but states that the overall request appears outsized. Respondent’s Response to Motion at ECF No. 31. Petitioner filed no reply thereafter.

The rates requested for attorney work performed through 2026 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be awarded herein.

Petitioner requests $796.72 in overall costs. ECF No. 29 at 29. Such costs reflect the expenses of obtaining medical records, the Court’s filing fee, and mailing services. I have reviewed the requested costs but find that Petitioner’s counsel has not substantiated one of the requested costs with the required documentation, such as an invoice or proof of payment. 3 Before reimbursement of costs will be made, sufficient supporting documentation, such as invoices, receipts, and billing statements, must be provided. See Guidelines for Practice Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program at 72- 74 (emphasis added). 4

When Petitioners fail to provide appropriate documentation to substantiate a requested cost, special masters have refrained from awarding the relevant sum. See, e.g., Gardner-Cook v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-480V, 2005 WL 6122520, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 30, 2005). Accordingly, I will disallow reimbursement for the unsubstantiated cost herein. This reduces the total amount of costs to be awarded by $155.25.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT, in part, Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs 3 There is no invoice or proof of payment provided for item dated 1/3/2025, Medical Report/TEI Medical Chronology, in the amount of $155.25. in the total amount of $32,253.77 (representing $31,612.30 in fees plus $641.47 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). 4 The guidelines for Practice Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program can be found at: https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/guidelines-practice-under-national-vaccine-injury-compensation-program

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.