U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, 2001

United States v. Begin

United States v. Begin
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided August 29, 2001
United States v. Begin

Opinion

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES v. Jeremy J. BEGIN Seaman Recruit, U.S. Coast Guard CGCMS 24211 Docket No. 1150 August 2001 Special Court-Martial convened by Commanding Officer, USCGC ACUSHNET (WMEC-167). Tried at Thirteenth Coast Guard District Legal Office, Seattle, Washington, on 25 January 2001.

Military Judge: CAPT Ronald E. Kilroy, USCG Trial Counsel: LT(jg) D. O’Connell, USCG Assistant Trial Counsel: LT(jg) J. Alexander, USCG Detailed Defense Counsel: LT E.J. Osterhues, JAGC, USNR Appellate Defense Counsel: CDR Jeffrey C. Good, USCG Appellate Government Counsel: LT Sandra J. Miracle, USCGR BEFORE PANEL EIGHT BAUM, CASSELS, & PALMER Appellate Military Judges Per curiam: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was found guilty of one specification of wrongful use and one specification of wrongful distribution of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Appellant was sentenced to confinement for three months, forfeiture of $695.20 per month for three months, and to be discharged from the Coast Guard with a bad- conduct discharge. The Convening Authority reduced the forfeitures to $695 per month for three months but otherwise approved the sentence as adjudged, which was allowed by the sentence terms of the pretrial agreement. Before this Court, without admitting that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, Appellant has submitted this case on U.S. v. Jeremy J. BEGIN, No. 1150 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. 2001) its merits as to any and all errors.

We have reviewed the record in accordance with Article 66, UCMJ. Upon such review, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and on the basis of the entire record should be approved. Accordingly, the findings and sentence, as approved below, are affirmed.

For the Court,

//s// Kevin G. Ansley Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.