U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, 2006

Mk1 Sergent v. Rdml Rochon Order

Mk1 Sergent v. Rdml Rochon Order
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided December 20, 2006
Mk1 Sergent v. Rdml Rochon Order

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Charles R. SERGENT, 20 December 2006 Machinery Technician First Class (E-6), U.S. Coast Guard, Petitioner, PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS; PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF PROHIBITION; v. APPLICATION FOR AN EMERGENCY STAY OF PROCEEDINGS; AND REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL FILED WITH THIS COURT ON 15 DECEMBER 2006 RDML S. W. Rochon, USCG Convening Authority MISC. DOCKET N0. 001-07 Respondent ORDER – PANEL NINE

Petitioner, who has been charged with offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that are scheduled to be investigated under Article 32, UCMJ, has filed a petition for extraordinary relief styled as a request for relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition. He seeks an emergency order staying the Article 32, UCMJ, investigation until this Court rules on the substantive issues raised in his petition. He seeks a writ of mandamus ordering Respondent to detail a reporter to the investigation at no cost to the Petitioner and to provide the Petitioner with a copy of the audiotapes or a transcript; or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition prohibiting Respondent from interfering with the defense preparation of his case by requiring Respondent to permit the defense to record the investigation without any requirement to provide a written transcript to the Investigating Officer or the Government. Petitioner also moves this Court to have appellate defense counsel appointed to represent him. It is, by the Court, this 20th day of December 2006,

ORDERED: That the application for an emergency stay of proceedings and the request for appointment of appellate defense counsel are hereby denied, and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to raise the issues therein in the course of normal review under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

For the Court,

Jane R. Lim Clerk of the Court

Copy: Chief, Office of Military Justice Appellate Government Counsel Appellate Defense Counsel

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.