U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, 2012

United States v. Mendoza

United States v. Mendoza
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided September 7, 2012
United States v. Mendoza

Opinion

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Jesus A. MENDOZA Machinery Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMS 24476 Docket No. 1359 September 2012 Special Court-Martial convened by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Boston. Tried at Boston, Massachusetts, on 7 March, 17-18 May, and 15 June 2011.

Military Judge: CDR Michael C. Wessel, USCG Trial Counsel: LCDR Cassie A. Kitchen, USCG Assistant Trial Counsel: LT Gary C. Murphy, USCG Defense Counsel: LT Matthew S. Bartholomaus, JAGC, USN Appellate Defense Counsel: LCDR Paul R. Casey, USCG Appellate Government Counsel: LT Amanda M. Caprari Lee, USCG BEFORE MCCLELLAND, McGUIRE1 & McTAGUE Appellate Military Judges Per curiam: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and one specification of obstructing justice, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to reduction to E-1, confinement for five months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

The Convening Authority approved only so much of the sentence as included reduction to E-1, confinement for sixty days, and a bad-conduct discharge, in accordance with the pretrial agreement.

Before this Court, without admitting that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, Appellant has submitted this case on its merits as to any and all errors.

Judge McGuire did not participate in this decision.

United States v. Jesus A. MENDOZA, No. 1359 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. 2012)

Decision We have reviewed the record in accordance with Article 66, UCMJ. Upon such review, the findings and sentence are determined to be correct in law and fact and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence, as approved below, are affirmed.

For the Court,

Andrew R. Alder Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.