Hicks v. Kijakazi
Hicks v. Kijakazi
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
DAVID A. H., ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:22-cv-00456
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner District Judge Jill N. Parrish of the Social Security Administration, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendant.
On March 13, 2023, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg issued a Report and Recommendation that this court reverse the decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff David H.’s1 application for Disability Insurance Benefits and remand the case for further proceedings. The Commissioner moved for this reversal. ECF No. 27. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that a failure to object within fourteen days of service could result in a waiver of objections upon review by this court. David H. did not file an objection within the fourteen-day time limit. The Defendant’s failure to object waived any argument that the Report and Recommendation was in error. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop.,
73 F.3d 1057, 1060(10th Cir. 1996). However, the court need not apply the waiver rule as a procedural bar if “the interests of justice so dictate.”
Id.(quoting Moore v. United States,
950 F.2d 656, 659(10th Cir. 1991)). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and its conclusion that the
1 Pursuant to best practices in the District of Utah addressing privacy concerns in certain cases, including social security cases, the court refers to the plaintiff by his first name and last initial only. Commissioner’s decision should be reversed. The court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous and finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule. The court, therefore, ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 28, is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The court GRANTS the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to remand. ECF No. 27. 3. The court REVERSES the Commissioner’s determination in David H.’s case. 4. The court REMANDS the case for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
DATED April 4, 2023 BY THE COURT . 1. GAWA ye Fae United States District Court Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown