Shen Engineers v. Brighton

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION SHEN ENGINEERS, INC., a Utah MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Corporation, ORDER Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-00624 HCN DBP Vv.

District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr RICHARD BRIGHTON, an individual, d/b/a BRIGHTON ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant.

Plaintiff Shen Engineers, Inc. moves the court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 18.)' The motion is timely, it was filed on the last day to file for amended pleadings, and there has been no opposition filed. Leave to amend is to be freely granted. See Foman vy. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Aalco Construction Co. v. F.

Linneman Construction Co., 399 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1968); Food Basket, Inc. v. Albertsons, 383 F.2d 785 (10th Cir. 1967). And the court finds no reason to deny Plaintiffs motion.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.

DATED this 8 May 2023.

Dustf-B- Pyad United Stafes Mapistrate Judge ' The case is referred from Judge Howard Nielson for consideration of all nondispositive pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). (ECF No. 14.)