Nadine Salyer v. Flexan, LLC; Ingersoll Rand Industrial Technologies, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH NADINE SALYER, ORDER ADOPTING [8] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING Plaintiff, [2] MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. Case No. 2:25-cv-01063-DBB FLEXAN, LLC; and INGERSOLL RAND INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, District Judge David Barlow Defendants.
On November 21, 2025, Plaintiff Nadine Salyer filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 On January 6, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg entered a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court deny the motion because Plaintiff had not submitted required information to demonstrate an inability to pay the filing fee.2 The magistrate judge also advised Ms. Salyer of her right to object to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of its service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).3 Ms. Salyer did not file an objection, and she subsequently paid the court filing fee.4 Because no objection was filed, the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.5 Having done so, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s analysis and conclusions are sound and that no clear error is present.
1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 2, filed Nov. 21, 2025.
2 Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, entered Jan. 6, 2026.
3 Id. at 2.
4 See ECF No. 9.
5 Johnson v. Progressive Leasing, No. 2:22-cv-00052, 2023 WL 4044514, at *2 (D. Utah June 16, 2023); United States v. 2121 E. 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996) ([A] party’s objections to the magistrate judge’s Accordingly, it is ORDERED that that the [8] Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's [2] Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED.
Signed January 27, 2026.
BY THE COURT David Barlow United States District Judge report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review.”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.