Stephens v. Continental Insurance
Stephens v. Continental Insurance
Opinion of the Court
This is an action on a fire insurance policy to recover for loss sustained by fire. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $503.85 and costs of suit.. This appeal is from the order overruling the demurrer, and from the judgment. The legal questions which we are asked to determine in this case are precisely the same as those raised and determined in the case of Stephens v. Insurance Co., 14 Utah 265. The pleadings in both cases are also the same, except that
I dissent for the reasons given in my dissenting opinion in Stephens v. Insurance Co.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ELIZABETH STEPHENS v. THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
- Status
- Published