Boyle v. Boyle
Boyle v. Boyle
Opinion of the Court
This action was brought to recover the sum of $50. The plaintiff claims that that sum is due her for rents of a certain brick building collected and retained by the defendant. It is alleged in the complaint, in substance, that in an action for divorce, instituted by this plaintiff against her husband, Robert B. Boyle, the court, on December 30, 1897, entered a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and husband, and granted certain property rights to each of the parties to that action, that decree being referred to and made a part of the complaint herein; that about August 10, 1898, Robert B. Boyle conveyed all of his property and interests, so decreed to him, by warranty deed to this defendant; that since the conveyance the grantee collected and received the rents of the property, and especially the rents of that part of the premises described in paragraph 8 of that decree; that by the terms of said paragraph 8, this plaintiff is entitled to' one third of the rents received for the brick building situate upon the lots described in that paragraph, which lots are also described in this complaint; and that the defendant has collected and received
It will be observed that this refers to paragraph 7 of the same decree, wherein Bobert B. Boyle, the defendant’s grantor, was “given and awarded absolutely and in fee simple, freed from any liens or claims upon the part of the plaintiff,” therein, who is also the plaintiff herein, certain real estate, including the lots upon which the brick building referred to in paragraph 8 is situated. Considering each paragraph separately, the latter, it must be conceded, seems inconsistent with the former. The two paragraphs, however, must, for the purpose of determining the intent of the decree, be construed together. When so construed it is clear that the intention of the court, as manifested by its decree, was to award to Bobert B. Boyle the property in fee simple, but with the reservation of one third of the rents of the brick building
We are of the opinion that the complaint states-a cause of action. The case must therefore be reversed, with costs, and remanded with directions to the court below to set aside its judgment of dismissal and overrule the demurrer.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SARAH E. BOYLE v. ELIZABETH BOYLE
- Status
- Published