Salt Lake City v. Revene
Salt Lake City v. Revene
127 P.2d 254; 101 Utah 512; 1942 Utah LEXIS 18
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Salt Lake City v. Revene
Opinion of the Court
By inadvertence costs in this case were allowed against the city. This was error. See Nephi City v. Forrest, 41 Utah 433, 126 P. 332. That part of the decision which reads “costs to respondent” [124 P. 2d 537, 540] is hereby stricken and with that change the opinion and decision is confirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.