Utah Supreme Court, 1969

Bowman v. Bowman

Bowman v. Bowman
Utah Supreme Court · Decided December 5, 1969 · Callister, Crockett, Ellett, Henriod, Tuckett
23 Utah 2d 273; 462 P.2d 156; 1969 Utah LEXIS 536

Bowman v. Bowman

Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment awarding property in a divorce matter. Affirmed, with costs to Mrs. Bowman.

No point on appeal is indexed as required under the rules. It was raised, however under the argument in the brief. Appellant urges that the court abused its discretion in the award made. 'The record was referred to only twice in the brief, each time reflecting a self-serving assertion subject to dispute by other evidence in a 300 page record. Under the circumstances an affirmance of the trial court is justified under the conclusions in Lepasiotes v. Dinsdale,1 having to do with reference to supporting evidence in the record.

Irrespective of that holding, the record reflects that sufficient admissible, competent and substantial evidence supported the judgment of the lower court.

Counsel for Mr. B., a non-participant at the trial, proffered proof dehors the record in support of his claimed error in the award. Under familiar rules of appellate procedure, such evidence is not reviewable.

CROCKETT, C. J., and CALLISTER, TUCKETT and ELLETT, JJ., concur.

. 121 Utah 359, 242 P.2d 297 (1952).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.