Appeal from a judgment sequeling a remand from this court in the same titled case, 21 Utah 2d 124, 441 P.2d 705 (1968), where this court concluded that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment, since there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether a truck was stolen or no. Affirmed, with no costs.

Reference is made to the previous case for the facts and points involved. On the remand hearing, the record reveals that *69there were no facts sufficient to establish that the vehicle was stolen, and the trial court so found, with which conclusion we agree. Our only alternative, therefore, is to affirm.