Having heard oral arguments and having further reviewed the record and the briefs on file, it appears that certiorari was improvidently granted. The case is therefore dismissed.

(dissenting):

I dissent. I do not join in dismissing the writ of certiorari. No valid reason exists for doing so, and the majority expresses none. In Israel Pagan Estate v. Capitol Thrift and Loan, 771 P.2d 1032 (Utah 1989) (Howe, Assoc. C.J., dissenting), I set out the conditions under which the United States Supreme Court dismisses writs of certiorari as having been improvidently granted and suggested that we follow its practice. None of those conditions exist here, and I decry the wasteful use of time and money of the parties, their lawyers, and this Court which dismissal promotes. I refer the reader to that opinion for a full expression of my views on this practice.