Armistead v. Marks
Armistead v. Marks
Opinion of the Court
On the first point
As to the other point (which was suggested by the court) we are of opinion, that as the deputy sheriff was in no respect concerned in the merits of the cause, he alone, might obtain a supersedeas.
The enquiry of damages must therefore, be set aside, as to all the defendants, as must the proceedings subsequent to the declaration, and the cause is tobe proceeded in anew upon the sheriff’s return, made upon the writs issued against the two Clai-bornes.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.