Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1799

Bogle v. Sullivant

Bogle v. Sullivant
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided April 26, 1799 · Pendleton
5 Va. 487; 1 Call 561; 1799 Va. LEXIS 20

Bogle v. Sullivant

Opinion of the Court

PENDLETON, President.

Delivered .the resolution of the Court to the following effect:

The Court sees no difference between this and other cases, where the evidence is admitted, and the weight which it ought to have is left to the jury, who have a right to decide it.* We, therefore, discover no error in the judgment; and, consequently, deny the motion for a writ of supersedeas,

[* Ross v. Gill et ux. 1 Wash. 90; Keel et al. v. Herbert, 1 Wash. 203; Blincoe v. Berkeley, l Call, 412;Whitacre v. McIlhaney, 4 Munf, 313.]

[† See Clark v. Sanderson, S Binney, 192; Sluby v. Champlin, 4 Johns. R. 461; Nelson v. Whittall, 1 Barn. & Ald. 19.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.