Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1799

Bogle v. Sullivant

Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided April 26, 1799 · Pendleton

5 Va. 487; 1 Call 561; 1799 Va. LEXIS 20

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Womack v. Circle (Va. 1877)
Womack v. Circle (Va. 1877)
Cropper v. Commonwealth (General Court of Virginia 1843)
Cropper v. Commonwealth (General Court of Virginia 1843)
Cropper v. Commonwealth (General Court of Virginia 1843)
Dabney v. Taliaferro (Va. Ct. App. 1826)
Brooke v. Young (Va. 1824)
Brooke v. Young (Va. 1824)
Brooke v. Young (Va. 1824)
Brooke v. Young (Va. 1824)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PENDLETON, President.

Delivered .the resolution of the Court to the following effect:

The Court sees no difference between this and other cases, where the evidence is admitted, and the weight which it ought to have is left to the jury, who have a right to decide it.* We, therefore, discover no error in the judgment; and, consequently, deny the motion for a writ of supersedeas, †

[* Ross v. Gill et ux. 1 Wash. 90; Keel et al. v. Herbert, 1 Wash. 203; Blincoe v. Berkeley, l Call, 412;Whitacre v. McIlhaney, 4 Munf, 313.]

[† See Clark v. Sanderson, S Binney, 192; Sluby v. Champlin, 4 Johns. R. 461; Nelson v. Whittall, 1 Barn. & Ald. 19.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.