Richardson v. Johnson
Richardson v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
Delivered the resolution of the Court to the following effect:
That the plea of payment was improperly put in by the attorney, instead of pleading the discharge. That this was done through inadvertence, and for want of information. Consequently, that the Court was right in granting the
Judgment affirmed,
[* See 6 Bac. Abr. 671, Gwil, ed. and autho. there cited.]
[† Elliott's ex'rs, v. Lyell, 3 Call, 268; Chandlers ex'rx, v. Neale's ex'rs. 2 H. & M. 124; Atwell's adm'rs, v. Milton, 4 H. &. M. 253; Atwell's admr's. v. Towles, 1 Munf. 175.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.