Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1995

Mary Ellen Hines, etc. v. Larry Joe Wagstaff

Mary Ellen Hines, etc. v. Larry Joe Wagstaff
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided September 19, 1995

Mary Ellen Hines, etc. v. Larry Joe Wagstaff

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

MARY ELLEN HINES, f/k/a MARY ELLEN WAGSTAFF v. Record No. 0750-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM LARRY JOE WAGSTAFF SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Richard J. Jamborsky, Judge (Mary Ellen Hines, pro se, on brief).

(Susan Massie Hicks; Thomas P. Sotelo; Leiner, Hicks & Sotelo, on brief), for appellee.

Mary Ellen Hines contends the trial judge erred by failing to include the closing date of December 31, 1995 in the text of an injunction order barring her from harassing her former husband, Larry Joe Wagstaff. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial judge. Rule 5A:27.

In his ruling from the bench, the trial judge extended the injunction against Hines until December 31, 1995. The transcript from that ruling was attached to and incorporated by reference into the order entered March 7, 1995. The order thus contains a closing date for the temporary injunction and is in compliance with Code § 8.01-624. * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the judgment order.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.