Franklin City PW v. Haywood Riddick
Franklin City PW v. Haywood Riddick
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
FRANKLIN CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL GROUP SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM v. Record No. 0397-96-3 JUNE 25, 1996 HAYWOOD RIDDICK
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert A. Rapaport; Lynne M. Ferris; Knight, Dudley, Clarke & Dolph, on brief), for appellants.
No brief for appellee.
Franklin City Public Works and its insurer contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Haywood Riddick's hearing loss qualifies as an occupational "disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").
This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, 251 Va. 186, 199, 467 S.E.2d 795, 802 (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act").
Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.
Reversed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.