Cindy H. Thomasson v. Sara Lee Knit Products
Cindy H. Thomasson v. Sara Lee Knit Products
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
CINDY H. THOMASSON v. Record No. 1792-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM SARA LEE KNIT PRODUCTS, MARCH 12, 1996 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, PLUMA, INC. AND HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Peter McIntosh; Michie, Hamlett, Lowry, Rasmussen & Tweel, on brief), for appellant.
(Dale W. Webb; Monica L. Taylor; Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore, on brief), for appellees Sara Lee Knit Products and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois.
No brief for appellees Pluma, Inc. and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company.
Cindy H. Thomasson appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27.
This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act").
Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.