COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AND LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0639-05-3 PER CURIAM JULY 12, 2005 ARNOLD J. MOORE, JR.

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (James A.L. Daniel; Janine M. Jacob; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley & Smitherman, P.C., on brief), for appellants.

Philip B. Baker; Sanzone & Baker, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission and contend the commission erred as a matter of law in finding that Arnold J. Moore, Jr. proved the surgical implantation of his spinal cord stimulator constituted reasonable and necessary medical treatment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Moore v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, VWC File No. 205-85-17 (Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.