Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2005

Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Richard L. Bailey

Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Richard L. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided May 10, 2005

Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Richard L. Bailey

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bumgardner, Kelsey and Senior Judge Hodges

TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0044-05-4 PER CURIAM MAY 10, 2005 RICHARD L. BAILEY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Francis H. Foley; The Hartford Staff Counsel, on brief), for appellants.

(Julie H. Heiden; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee.

Truland Systems Corporation and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that employer failed to prove that Richard L. Bailey was terminated for justified cause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bailey v. Truland Systems Corp., VWC File No. 217-10-25 (Dec. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.