Sodexho, Inc. and v. Curtis Clanton
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman
SODEXHO, INC. AND
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE
OF PENNSYLVANIA/AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC.
MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2364-07-2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 12, 2008 CURTIS CLANTON
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Bryan J. Olmos; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for appellants.
(Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee.
Sodexho, Inc. and its insurer contend the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in finding that Curtis Clanton proved he sustained a compensable change in condition and awarding him temporary total disability benefits commencing April 14, 2006. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Clanton v. Sodexho, Inc., VWC File No. 221-53-73 (Aug. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.