Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2008

Micheal R. Lane, Sr. v. Virginia Employment Commission and Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation

Micheal R. Lane, Sr. v. Virginia Employment Commission and Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided January 15, 2008

Micheal R. Lane, Sr. v. Virginia Employment Commission and Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Clements and Senior Judge Annunziata

MICHEAL R. LANE, SR. MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1809-07-2 PER CURIAM JANUARY 15, 2008 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND VAN GO, INC. OF RICHMOND CORPORATION

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge (Martin Wegbreit; Central Virginia Legal Aid Society, on briefs), for appellant.

(Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General; Elizabeth B. Peay, Assistant Attorney General; Thomas W. Nesbitt, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee Virginia Employment Commission.

No brief for appellee Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation.

Micheal R. Lane, Sr. appeals a decision of the circuit court denying his claim for unemployment benefits. The circuit court affirmed the ruling of the Virginia Employment Commission finding that Lane was terminated from his employment with Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation due to work-related misconduct under Code § 60.2-618(2). We have reviewed the record and the circuit court’s June 1, 2007 opinion letter and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the circuit court in its June 1, 2007 opinion letter and its July 10, 2007 final order. See Lane v. Virginia Employment Comm’n, Case No. 760CL06006617-00-01 (June 1, 2007 and July 10, 2007). We dispense with

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.