Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and Federal Insurance Company v. Hanadi Asfour
Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and Federal Insurance Company v. Hanadi Asfour
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman FINDLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION AND FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1678-09-4 PER CURIAM DECEMBER 29, 2009 HANADI ASFOUR
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Richard S. Sperbeck; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellants.
(M. Thomas McWeeny; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee.
Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and Federal Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as employer) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Hanadi Asfour (claimant) was entitled to temporary total disability benefits having proved she made a reasonable effort to market her residual work capacity. Employer contends the commission erred in determining that claimant made adequate marketing efforts. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Asfour v. Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation, VWC File No. 237-22-45 (July 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.