Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2010

Colas, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Anthony Williams Riddick

Colas, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Anthony Williams Riddick
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided April 13, 2010

Colas, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Anthony Williams Riddick

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Retired Judge Hodges ∗

COLAS, INC. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION ∗∗ v. Record No. 2624-09-1 PER CURIAM APRIL 13, 2010 ANTHONY WILLIAMS RIDDICK

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert A. Rapaport; Bonnie P. Lane; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hull, Brunick & Garriott, P.L.C., on brief), for appellants.

(Matthew H. Kraft; Matthew H. Kraft, P.L.C., on brief), for appellee.

Colas, Inc. and its insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that the evidence was sufficient to conclude Anthony Riddick made reasonable efforts to market his residual work capacity. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Riddick v. Colas, Inc., VWC File No. 238-90-60 (Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

∗ Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D). ∗∗ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.