Alice M. Deane v. Marshalls, Inc. and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata
ALICE M. DEANE
MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1052-11-2 PER CURIAM AUGUST 30, 2011 MARSHALLS, INC. AND
AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF
READING, PENNSYLVANIA
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Alice M. Deane, pro se, on brief.)
(C. Ervin Reid; S. Virginia Bondurant; Goodman, Allen & Filetti, on brief), for appellees.
Alice M. Deane appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding her claim for benefits for psychological conditions is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Deane v. Marshalls, Inc., VWC File No. 219-35-94 (May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.