Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2011

Richard Allen Frayer v. Williams Brothers Lawn & Tree Service, etc.

Richard Allen Frayer v. Williams Brothers Lawn & Tree Service, etc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided February 1, 2011

Richard Allen Frayer v. Williams Brothers Lawn & Tree Service, etc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner

RICHARD ALLEN FRAYER MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1987-10-3 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 1, 2011 WILLIAMS BROTHERS LAWN & TREE SERVICE AND BUILDING INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, INC.

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John S. Hart, Jr.; Hart Law Offices, on brief), for appellant.

(Robert M. Himmel; Lucas & Kite PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Richard Allen Frayer appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding he unjustifiably refused vocational rehabilitation services. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Frayer v. Williams Bros. Lawn & Tree Serv., VWC File No. 231-98-27 (Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.