7-Eleven, Inc. 11070 and Ace American Insurance Company v. Charleen M. Drew
7-Eleven, Inc. 11070 and Ace American Insurance Company v. Charleen M. Drew
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata
7-ELEVEN, INC. #11070 AND ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2613-11-2 PER CURIAM MAY 8, 2012 CHARLEEN M. DREW
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Joseph F. Giordano; Kathryn Lea Harman; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on briefs), for appellants.
(Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, P.C., on brief), for appellee.
7-Eleven, Inc. #11070 and Ace American Insurance Company appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that they are responsible for surgery and replacement of a quad cane and diabetic shoes, recommended by the treating physician. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final, majority opinion. See Drew v. 7-Eleven, Inc., VWC File No. 225-24-14 (Nov. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.