Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Ronnell L. Wilson
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Ronnell L. Wilson
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Senior Judge Bumgardner UNPUBLISHED
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AND LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2075-12-3 PER CURIAM MARCH 26, 2013 RONNELL L. WILSON
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (James A. L. Daniel; Daniel, Medley & Kirby, P.C., on brief), for appellants.
(Philip B. Baker; Sanzone & Baker, P.C., on brief), for appellee.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Insurance Corporation appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that (1) Ronnell L. Wilson’s September 21, 2009 claim was not barred by Code § 65.2-601; (2) Wilson did not unjustifiably refuse medical treatment; (3) Wilson adequately marketed his residual capacity beginning September 14, 2009; and (4) Wilson experienced a change in condition. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Wilson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., VWC File No. JCN 2093707 (Oct. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.