Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2014

Sandra Dellairo, Widow of Natan Dellairo v. Rountree Construction Company, Inc.

Sandra Dellairo, Widow of Natan Dellairo v. Rountree Construction Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided June 3, 2014

Sandra Dellairo, Widow of Natan Dellairo v. Rountree Construction Company, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman UNPUBLISHED

SANDRA DELLAIRO, WIDOW OF NATHAN DELLAIRO, DECEASED MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0177-14-1 PER CURIAM JUNE 3, 2014 ROUNTREE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND COMMONWEALTH CONTRACTORS GROUP SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION/LANDIN INCORPORATED

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John H. Klein; Montagna, Klein, Camden LLP , on brief), for appellant.

(Daniel E. Lynch; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Lynch & Cornett, PC, on brief), for appellees.

Sandra Dellairo (claimant) appeals from a January 3, 2014 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her claim for death benefits following the death of her husband after he underwent medical treatment for his September 18, 2009 work injury. On appeal, claimant contends the commission “erred in finding that [she] failed to meet her burden of proof by establishing causal connection between the June 15, 2011 cervical epidural injection and the employee’s death on June 19, 2011.” Upon reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission’s decision. Rule 5A:27.

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. opinion. See Dellairo v. Rountree Constr. Co., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000162954 (Jan. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.