Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2014

Daniel F. Broadhurst 810-11566 v. Daniel Broadhurst

Daniel F. Broadhurst 810-11566 v. Daniel Broadhurst
Court of Appeals of Virginia · Decided August 26, 2014

Daniel F. Broadhurst 810-11566 v. Daniel Broadhurst

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata UNPUBLISHED

DANIEL F. BROADHURST 810-11566 AND VANLINER INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0410-14-1 PER CURIAM AUGUST 26, 2014 DANIEL BROADHURST

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (S. Vernon Priddy III; Stephen A. Marshall; Two Rivers Law Group, P.C., on brief), for appellants.

No brief for appellee.

Daniel F. Broadhurst 810-11566 and Vanliner Insurance Company appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the commission”) amending the average weekly wage of Daniel Broadhurst to an amount greater than that originally stipulated to by the parties on March 9, 2012. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Broadhurst v. Broadhurst 810-11566, VWC File No. VA00000592497 (Feb.

3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.