W. D. Sams & Son, Inc. v. Davis Construction & Develpoment Corp.
Opinion of the Court
This is being heard on a petition to determine if the complainant’s mechanic’s lien is void and unenforceable because a suit to enforce the lien was not brought against the owner of the property within the six month’s limitation period contained in Va. Code Section 43-17.
On April 23, 1982, this proceeding was filed naming as defendants both Stewart Title of Tidewater, the owner of the property, and Dominion National Bank, the beneficiary of a deed of trust on the property. However, this was incorrect since on April 22, 1982, the day immediately preceding the filing of this suit, title to the property had been conveyed to Dominion National Bank by a trustee’s deed.
Thus, Stewart Title of Tidewater was not owner at the time of filing and Dominion National Bank was. Dominion National Bank now contends that since it was not named as owner, the action was not filed against it within the statutorily required time period and the complainant’s lien is therefore unenforceable.
A suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien must be filed against the owner of the property within six months from the time the memorandum of lien is recorded. Va. Code Section 43-17 (1981); Commonwealth Mechanical Contractors,
Therefore, I am of the opinion that the complainant’s lien is not void and unenforceable on the ground that no suit was filed to enforce it within the statutory limitation period.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.