Virginia Chancery Court, 1806

Radford's Executors v. Innes's

Radford's Executors v. Innes's
Virginia Chancery Court · Decided September 23, 1806
1 Va. 7

Counsel

William Radford to fatn.es Junes., The Attorney General and Mimford, for the complainants,, Copland,

Radford's Executors v. Innes's

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The reasons assigned for a continuance are not sufficient to induce the court to depart from the general rule ; and that is, never to continue a motion for the dissolution of an injunction, unless from some very great necessity, because the court is always open to grant, and, of course, to reinstate an injunction, whenever it shall appear proper to do so, and because too the plaintiff should always be ready to prove hia bill. The injunction must be dissolved.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.