Escudero v. Hynes
Opinion of the Court
The matter under advisement are the demurrers filed by Third Party Defendants, Olivia Y. Jenney, Prudential Residential Services Limited Partnership, and Veronica Connelly. I have considered the pleadings, the arguments of counsel, and the memoranda of law filed by counsel, as welt as the relevant ease law and find the demurrers should be sustained for the reasons stated below.
First, with respect to third party defendants, Jenney and Prudential, I find they are not parties to the sales contract at issue and, therefore, are not bound by any of its terms. Even were the three third party defendants to be considered parties to the sales contract, the third party motion for judgment fails to allege facts setting forth a legally cognizable duty which Jenney, Prudential, and Connelly allegedly breached. Neither provision relative to the well and septic system inspections set forth in the sales' contract nor any other allegation in the pleading can be read to establish such a duty.
Specifically with respect to the obligations arising under the well and septic inspection provision, I believe
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.