yi □□

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ben Richmond Division we RICHMOND □□□□□ GERALD M. COATES, Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 3:19CV146 MR. NWAOKOCHA, et ai., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

action. In order to state a viable claim under

, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,

(4th Cir. 1998) (citing

). Plaintiff's current allegations failed to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,

(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson,

(1957)). Plaintiff also did not identify the particular constitutional right that the defendants violated through their conduct. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on September 26, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the entry of the September 26, 2019 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond

to September 26, 2019 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

fs/ M. Hannah Lauc United States District Fudge Date: OCT 2 | 2019 Richmond, Virginia