Brown v. Quintana

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Brown v. Quintana

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JAMAR BROWN, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:20CV246 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN QUINTANA, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Jamar Brown, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted this

28 U.S.C. § 2241

Petition. In his § 2241 Petition, Brown seeks release to a halfway house under the Second Chance Act of 2007, which amended

28 U.S.C. § 3624

. (ECF No. 1, at 1.) Brown is currently incarcerated in Lexington FMC, in Lexington, Kentucky. (/d. at 1.) “Whenever a § 2241 habeas petitioner seeks to challenge his present physical custody within the United States, he should name his warden as respondent and file the petition in the district of confinement.” Rumsfeld v. Padilla,

542 U.S. 426, 447

(2004) (emphasis added); see United States v. Broadway, No. 3:08- cr-00010-MR-2,

2018 WL 5817939

, at *1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2018) (“[A] defendant may challenge the BOP’s actions under the Second Chance Act only by filing the appropriate pleading in the district court located in the district of confinement, not the sentencing court.” (citations omitted)). Brown is also warned that prior to seeking relief under the Second Chance Act, he must exhaust all administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons.

Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Brown remains free to refile the action in the district of his confinement. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

M. Hannah MK L United States District Judge Date: Man \, 2020 Richmond, Virginia

Reference

Status
Unknown