Zembower v. City of Norfolk

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Zembower v. City of Norfolk

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JOSHUA ALAN ZEMBOWER, Petitioner, Vv. Civil No. 3:20cv386 (DJN) CITY OF NORFOLK, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Joshua Alan Zembower (“Petitioner”), a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus complaining about his ongoing detention, the denial of bond, his potential extradition to Maryland, and his conditions of confinement. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner seeks immediate release and “the issuance of formal charges for any and all involved officials.” (Jd. at 15 (capitalization corrected).) By Memorandum Order entered on June 16, 2020, the Court explained that it would not conduct a general inquiry into what appears to be Maryland state court prosecution, his ongoing detention, or a denial of bond. (ECF No. 3.) Rather, Petitioner must identify a violation of federal or constitutional law. It is not clear from Petitioner’s submissions whether he wishes to pursue a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. See Rivenbark v. Virginia,

305 F. App’x 144, 145

(4th Cir. 2008). He may not do both by way of

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. Accordingly, on June 16, 2020, the Court provided Petitioner with forms for filing a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 or for filing a

28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition. (ECF No. 3.) The Court directed Petitioner to complete the forms for either a 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 petition or a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action and return the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court explained that the failure to complete an appropriate form and return the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not completed and returned either form. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall issue. Let the Clerk file a copy of this Memorandum Opinion electronically and send a copy to Petitioner.

David J. Novak United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Date: July 20, 2020

Reference

Status
Unknown