Lambert v. Middle River Regional Jail
Lambert v. Middle River Regional Jail
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
BRANDON S. LAMBERT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 7:20CV00001 ) v. ) OPINION ) ) By: James P. Jones MIDDLE RIVER REGIONAL JAIL, ) United States District Judge ) Defendant. )
Brandon S. Lambert, Pro Se Plaintiff.
The plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that an officer at a local jail used excessive force against him. After review of the record, I conclude that the action must be summarily dismissed. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1), the court may dismiss a prisoner’s civil action concerning prison conditions “if the court is satisfied that the action is frivolous, malicious, [or] fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” A frivolous claim is one that “lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325(1989) (interpreting “frivolous” in former version of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)). To state a cause of action under §1983, a plaintiff must establish that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States
and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of state law. West v. Atkins,
487 U.S. 42, 48(1988). The only entity that Lambert names as a defendant in this case is the jail itself. The jail, however, is not
a person subject to suit under § 1983. McCoy v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr.,
788 F. Supp. 890, 893-94(E.D. Va. 1992). Because Lambert’s complaint presents no legal basis for a claim actionable under § 1983 against the only defendant he has named, the court will summarily
dismiss this action without prejudice under § 1997e(c)(1) as frivolous.1 A separate Order will be entered herewith. DATED: February 3, 2020
/s/ JAMES P. JONES United States District Judge
1 I note that Lambert also filed a nearly identical § 1983 complaint naming a jail official, Sergeant Walter L. Thomas, as the defendant who allegedly used excessive force against Lambert. Lambert v. Thomas, 7:20CV00002. Because Thomas is a person who can be sued under § 1983, I will direct the clerk to attempt service of the complaint in that case on Thomas.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown