Rozier v. Horton

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Rozier v. Horton

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER ROZIER, Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00464 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. By: Michael F. Urbanski D. HORTON, et al, Chief United States District Judge Defendant(s),

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). By order entered September 23, 2020, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the order the consent to fees form in order to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. ENTER: This 28th gay of October, 2020. Michael F. Urbanski Chief U.S. District Judge 2020.10.28 15:53:17 -04'00' Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown