IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MOMOLLU V.S. SIRLEAF, SR., Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 3:21CV234 JIMMY DOE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, has submitted this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

(g). As Plaintiff is aware, he has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. See, e.g., Sirleaf v. Harris, No. 19- 2520 (UNA),

, at *3 (D.D.C. June 3, 2020); Sirleaf v. Northam, No. 3:19CV182,

, at *5 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2019) (placing Plaintiff on “notice that with this dismissal, he now has three strikes under § 1915(g)”); Sirleaf v. McCabe, No. 7:19CV00240 (W.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2019), aff'd No. 19-5423 (4th Cir. Aug. 21, 2019); Sirleafv. Mikeljohn, No. 3:18CV562,

, at *10 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2019); aff'd sub nom. Sirleaf v. Meiklejohn,

(4th Cir. 2019). Plaintiffs current complaint

does not suggest that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. | Accordingly, his request to proceed in forma pauperis will be DENIED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent that he wishes to bring a claim solely on his own behalf, Plaintiff remains free to submit a new complaint with the full $402 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. It is so ORDERED.

/§/ M. Hannah United States Diktrict Judge Date: Ayn | 24 { 2o2| Richmond, Virginia

' To the contrary, Plaintiff again attempts to bring an action on behalf of a child, which the Court has already warned him more than once that he may not do. See, e. g., Sirleaf,

, at *2-6.