District Court, W.D. Virginia, 2021

Wilson v. Unknown

Wilson v. Unknown
District Court, W.D. Virginia · Decided March 24, 2021
Wilson v. Unknown

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ROANOKE DIVISION

LINDSEY ANTONIO WILSON, ) ) Civil Action No. 7:21cv00096

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION )

UNNAMED, ) By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen ) United States District Judge

Defendant. )

Plaintiff Lindsey Antonio Wilson, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against an unidentified defendant. Wilson seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis with this action. Having reviewed Wilson’s request and complaint, the court grants his request to proceed in forma pauperis but concludes that Wilson fails to state a cognizable § 1983 claim. Accordingly, the court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Wilson alleges that on May 11, 2020, a “Danville news crew published in the newspaper and online” that Wilson “murdered a man on July 4, 2019.”1 As relief, Wilson states that he “would like to sue for slander and defamation of character.”

To state a cause of action under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts indicating that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of state According to online public state court records, although he was initially charged with second degree murder for an offense committed on July 4, 2019, Wilson pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter in the Danville Circuit Court on January 12, 2021 and is serving an active sentence of 5 years and 11 months. See Commonwealth v. law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988). Wilson does not name a defendant and does not allege any conduct committed by a person acting under color of state law. Therefore, the court concludes that Wilson has failed to state a cognizable § 1983 claim and, thus, will dismiss the amended complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

ENTERED this 24th day of March, 2021.

/s/ Thomas T. Cullen_________________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.