IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NEWPORT NEWS DIVISION NEDRA C., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO. 4:20-CV-144 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

FINAL ORDER Nedra C.! (“Plaintiff”) brought this action under Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act | (“SSA”),

(g), seeking judicial review of the decision of the defendant, Kilolo | Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), which | partially denied Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and denied her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). ECF No. 1. Both parties moved for summary judgment. |

ECF Nos. 20, 23.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a report and | recommendation pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72(b) | of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as Rule 72 of the Local Rules of this Court. ECF | No. 14. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was filed on February 8, 2022, which recommends that the Court grant the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF |

No. 23) and deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20). ECF No. 25 at 2, 20. | ' The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States has recommended that, due to significant privacy concerns in social security cases, federal courts should refer | to claimants only by their first names and last initials.

the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). To date, neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s |

Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing the same has expired. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed on February 8, 2022, having found no clear error on the face of the record. ECF No. 25. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS | Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 20, and UPHOLDS the final decision of the Commissioner. This case is, therefore, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Final Order to all Counsel of Record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Robery@ bithhat V7 cwt.w_ SOREL MTeG ROPES) age Norfolk, VA : February 24, 2022