Cobbs v. Walker
Cobbs v. Walker
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
MA’QUAL T. COBBS, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 3:21cv663(DJN) OFFICER WALKER, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
42 U.S.C. § 1983action. To state a viable claim under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,
145 F.3d 653, 658(4th Cir. 1998) (citing
42 U.S.C. § 1983). In his current complaint, Plaintiff does not identify the particular constitutional right violated by Defendant’s conduct. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on July 8, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. (ECF No. 41.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action.
More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the July 8, 2022 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 8, 2022 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Let the Clerk file a copy of the Memorandum Opinion electronically and send a copy to Plaintiff.
Is} David J. Novak \ United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dated: August 25, 2022
Reference
- Status
- Unknown