IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division RUKMINESH MEHTA, ) Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-917 (RDA/IDD) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) issued by Magistrate Judge Ivan Davis on October 6, 2022. Dkt. 5. In this case involving allegations of various Section 1983 and constitutional violations, Judge Davis recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Jn Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 2). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), the deadline for submitting objections to Judge Davis’ Recommendation was October 20, 2022. To date, no objections have been filed. After reviewing the record and Judge Davis’ Recommendation, and finding no clear error, ! the Court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS the Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Jn Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 2) is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record and Plaintiff It is SO ORDERED. Mr /s/ sec i Rosie D. Alsion, United States District Judge

' See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005) (holding that in the absence of any objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation’”).