IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JAMAR PAXTON, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-358—HEH RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER STAFF, ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) Plaintiff Jamar Paxton (“Plaintiff”), a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

action. To state a viable claim under

, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,

(4th Cir. 1998) (citing

). In his current Complaint, Plaintiff does not identify the particular constitutional right that was violated by Defendant’s conduct. Plaintiff's current allegations also fail to provide Defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,

(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson,

(1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on October 24, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. The

Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the October 24, 2022 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the October 24, 2022 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. NeW /s/ Henry E. Hudson Datel □□□ 12, 202% Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia