McSheffrey v. Powers
McSheffrey v. Powers
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
JOHN P. McSHEFFREY, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 2:23cv71 PAUL J. POWERS, et al., Respondents. FINAL ORDER Before the Court is a Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241, and Petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss (ECF No. 3). The matter was referred for disposition to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B)- (C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Local Civil Rule 72, and the April 2, 2002 Standing Order on Assignment of Certain Matters to United States Magistrate Judges. In a Report and Recommendation entered on February 28, 2023 (ECF No. 4), the Magistrate Judge recommended the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice, due to Petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his Petition. The parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent filed objections with the Court and the time to do so has expired. Having reviewed the record and having heard no objection, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on the grounds stated by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) in its entirety as the Court’s own opinion. Accordingly, the Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Further, Petitioner’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 3), is GRANTED. The Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date judgment is entered. Because the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 335-36(2003). The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to the Petitioner and counsel of record for the Respondent. It is so ORDERED. [M&S Mark S. Davis Chief Judge es Mark S. Davis United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia Date: ards 20a3
Reference
- Status
- Unknown